UNF's #1 Student-Run News Source

UNF Spinnaker

UNF's #1 Student-Run News Source

UNF Spinnaker

UNF's #1 Student-Run News Source

UNF Spinnaker

Troubling health care policies need fixing

The health insurance and pharmaceutical cartel, in cahoots with their conservative cronies in congress and the media, are using scare tactics, half-truths and bald-faced untruths in their full-court press to stymie health care reform.

In recent weeks these parasitic profiteers and their well compensated shills have poisoned the well of public discourse with a vile and pernicious strain of paranoia that simultaneously disgusts and mystifies.

For example: Did you know the Democrats want to kill your grandmother? They are setting up “death panels” to determine who lives and who dies, who receives medical care in advanced age and who gets used as biodegradable fertilizer. At least that’s what former Republican Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin thinks. Or perhaps I should say that’s what she “says” – it would border on journalistic malpractice to assert with any certitude that she is capable of “thinking.”

Point of fact: There is nothing resembling euthanasia in the health reform legislation currently being discussed in Congress. Not even close. The euthanasia hysteria seems to emanate from a provision that appropriates government funding for voluntary “end-of-life” counseling for those who wish to formulate a plan with their doctor regarding a living will. Even Republican Sen. Johnny Isakson, Ga., is incredulous about these asinine charges.

“How someone could take an end of life directive or a living will as that [euthanasia] is nuts,” said Isakson.

Is it too much to ask to debate the facts instead of straw men and red herrings? Health reform is a complicated issue that requires a substantive discussion replete with factuality not fear-mongering.

The U.S. spends 16 percent of its Gross Domestic Product on health care costs—much more than any other nation.  Health insurance premiums have increased 120 percent since just 1999 and have risen four times faster than wages and at twice the rate of inflation. Is the exorbitant cost of health care in the U.S. because we have the best system in the world? Not exactly.

According to the World Health Organization, the U.S. health system ranks No. 37—just ahead of Slovenia. The more likely cause of high health care costs is due to American health insurance companies spending 20 cents of every dollar on advertising, administrative costs and shareholder profits. The industry has spent $1.4 million per day fighting against health reform this year. Pocket change, really, considering the 400 percent increase in profits it has enjoyed since the beginning of this decade.

More than 60 percent of bankruptcies and roughly 50 percent of foreclosures are caused by medical bills. Nearly 50 million Americans have no insurance and an additional 25 million citizens are underinsured—meaning their insurance wouldn’t mean diddly-squat if they ever actually got sick.

If you believe President Obama is moving too quickly on health reform, consider this: President Theodore Roosevelt first campaigned for national health insurance back in 1912. Since TR’s failed attempt to ride the Bull Moose back to the White House, serious pushes for some form of public insurance have reappeared sporadically, only to be shut down by the same omnipotent special interest groups now attempting to thwart reform.

A public option would inject competition into an industry that has become almost completely monopolized. The competition a public option would create would in turn drive down premium costs and force private insurers to offer better care, or risk losing customers to Uncle Sam. Contrary to the corporate spin, a public plan would create more choice, not limit it.

It is obvious to any sentient observer that our health care system is broken. A robust public option would not be a panacea, but it would be a step in the right direction.

View Comments (2)
More to Discover

Comments (2)

Spinnaker intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. As such, we do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks, slurs, defamation, or the use of language that might be interpreted as libelous. Comments are reviewed and will be removed if they do not adhere to these standards. Spinnaker does not allow anonymous comments, and Spinnaker requires a valid email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments.
All UNF Spinnaker Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • P

    PeterAug 22, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    Yes, there should be reform, but I don’t think Obama’s plan is the right answer. I’m all for lowering costs but I don’t think a public option where private insurance companies who need to make a profit must compete with the govt who can work at a loss. Think about govt run medicare, which is about to go bankrupt. The U.S. Postal System is already bankrupt, and the Cash for Clunkers program was poorly executed where only 2% of the dealerships have been reimbursed, and many others have already quit the program b/c they have not been paid. When they say that 47 million are uninsured, they are factoring in illegal immigrants who make up 12% percent of that and young Americans who would rather spend their money elsewhere then on medical insurance. I am in favor of lowering taxes on all Americans so they can have more money to spend on their own healthcare and tort reform to do away with frivolous malpractice lawsuits which would lower doctors’ insurance rates where they can lower the costs of their medical bill. This is a country formed on self-reliance, not having the govt take care of you.

  • T

    TinaAug 21, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    I think that this was a very well thought out article. Opened my eyes to this problem I would have otherwise overlooked. Thank you Josh for being articulate and intelligent with what you had to say.