“Masturbator.”
“Whore.”
Any, or all, of these anger-filled words can be heard by UNF students walking on campus when a preacher is on the Green.
But administrators are looking to change that.
In response to increased complaints from faculty and students, a committee has been formed to weigh the rights of the students against the rights of the preachers under the First Amendment.
“We had a forum with students last semester, and the largest concern centered around the preachers on the Green,” said Mauricio Gonzalez, vice president of Student and International Affairs. “And now, we are starting to hear complaints from faculty members due to the volume.”
The complaints led to the idea of gathering people from across campus to discuss UNF’s free speech policy, Gonzalez said.
“The loudness and the interruption due to the decibel level is what we can deal with, where it is going to be difficult is the content of the speech because it is a gray area,” Gonzalez said. “Free speech will be protected; we have no desire to go down that path. And I’d venture to say this issue is going to be a very difficult issue to tackle.”
The plan the committee is considering for offenders includes a verbal warning from a faculty member and the option to relocate them to another part of campus for the first offense and a written letter from the administration detailing the offense on the second infraction.
The third offense would warrant being escorted off the premises by a police officer and asked to not return.
Once the Student Union’s construction is completed, preachers could be asked to relocate to that area due to the lack of classes surrounding the building. The likelihood of noise complaints
from faculty will be reduced, Gonzalez said.
But Student Body President John Barnes stressed the needs of the students.
“We have to find a better solution to address the student’s content concerns rather than just handling the faculty’s noise concerns,” Barnes said. “It’s not just freedom of speech; religion comes into play. It’s one thing to protest the government or a university policy, but religion brings a different aspect.”
One current preacher, Richard Doctor, 22, said his life was changed forever by preachers who came
before him.
He grew up in a non-Christian home and was converted two years ago by a preacher who spoke on the Green.
Doctor said he preaches on campuses to inform students about his vision of God and how people must repent or “God will punish them.”
Although he said some of what he preaches can be considered offensive, he attributes it to a lack
of thick skin.
Doctor also distanced himself from some of the more radical preachers.
Another minister, Tom Short of Tom Short Campus Ministries, a self-described moderate preacher who has lectured on the Green, also distances himself from the pack.
“I think my style speaks for itself,” Short said. “I could exercise [Brother Micah’s style] myself, but I don’t do it because I don’t think it is the best way to approach people.”
He also said the possible change in UNF’s policy would disturb him.
“The reason we have freedom of speech written into the Constitution is because speech everyone likes doesn’t need protection. It is the speech people don’t like that needs protection. It is censorship.”
Short said barring a drastic university policy change, he would come back to UNF to preach again, adding that the overall attitude towards his message was a very positive one.
E-mail James Cannon II at asst.news@unfspinnaker.com.
Sean • Feb 25, 2009 at 4:37 am
The use of terms such as fornicator, masturbator, and whore are not grounds for sexual harassment. Exploiting features, making lewd or vulgar gestures or comments are what will be able to help gravitate your case toward something more substantial. The policy that you’re looking for would fall under conduct or human resources anyways and it’s surely something that would not be considered for an individual who is neither a student nor a faculty or staff member. So where are you covered? Well, that’s where you have the ability to call the university police department and explain that he is genuinely harassing you — that is something which is truly protected by the university, but, unless he is calling your name out and particularly making an example out of you, there is little to no foundation for harassment, and certainly not slander which, by the way, would never apply for a student on a campus. From a legal perspective, you will never be able to keep him from shouting out his opinions because in every respect his opinions will always be protected as such the same way yours against him are as well.
And James, Micah has said plenty of things in the past that have lead to physical harm, but his conviction fuel his continued passion to spread what he believes, and you cannot fault the man for doing that.
James Campbell • Feb 20, 2009 at 12:11 pm
^ Like the above says, but also Brother Micah goes beyond his freedom of speech when he slanders random people walking by. I saw him doing his rant, point at a random girl walking by on the sidewalk and say “You are putting all the Wh***s out of business with all your free fornication!” The poor girl’s face was so dumb struck, that every girl in the area went wild on him. I fear for him because he is going to say the wrong thing, to the wrong person, and it will not be pretty.
Jeremy • Feb 19, 2009 at 6:05 pm
Aren’t cries of “fornicator,” “masturbator,” and “whore” sexual harassment? Doesn’t UNF have a legal obligation to protect students and staff from sexual harassment? Why are we allowing sexual harassment to be framed as a “free speech” issue?