UNF's #1 Student-Run News Source

UNF Spinnaker

UNF's #1 Student-Run News Source

UNF Spinnaker

UNF's #1 Student-Run News Source

UNF Spinnaker

38 descendants of Confederate soldiers and generals file lawsuit to preserve monument

Haneifah Ahmad, Reporter

ST. AUGUSTINE, Fla. – St. Augustine City Commission voted to have the oldest Confederate monument removed from the Plaza de la Constitution, until 38 descendants of Confederate soldiers filed a lawsuit to stop it.

This Civil War monument is 30-feet tall and lists the names of fallen soldiers. Many who wanted the monument to stay said that the monument honors the soldiers who did not have proper burials. According to the lawsuit, the descendants are worried that removing the historic relic might damage it in the process. 

Attorney David McCallister filed a separate lawsuit on June 22 in federal court to temporarily restrain the city from going forward with the process. The lawsuit was dismissed. Jill Pacetti, a direct descendant of a veteran on the memorial, filed the new lawsuit. Pacetti called Monday’s vote disheartening. 

“We just feel like to bring the memorial down because of a race issue is not going to bring the community together,” Pacetti said. “No one went through the necessary steps to even look at the architecture of the memorial. Can it be moved? Can it be taken apart?”

The petitioners are requesting a temporary hold of the process until the Historic Architectural Review Board can plan a safe removal. 

“This monument was a communal effort, public art, and social history…” the lawsuit stated. 

St. Augustine officials say they cannot guarantee the safety of large historic objects. According to Jenny Wolfe, St. Augustine’s historic preservation officer, it could take several weeks and more than $100,000 to remove the monument. 

Many who were in favor of the monument’s removal said the obelisk brought attention to slave history.

It is not decided where the monument will be moved.

___

For more information or news tips, or if you see an error in this story or have any compliments or concerns, contact [email protected].

About the Contributor
Navigate Left
  • A yard sign by the Student Union advertising upcoming programming about the Red Zone at the University of North Florida. (Carter Mudgett/Spinnaker)

    Features

    The Red Zone is approaching: a higher-risk time of year for sexual assaults

  • Maxwell Taylor (bass), Samuel Baglino (guitar/vocals), Luke Hoey (guitar) and Josh Gualino (drums) of Jacksonville Beachs Seagate. Photo courtesy of Seagate.

    Entertainment

    For surfers, skaters and go-go dancers, a night with Seagate

  • Yaupon Holly lead singer Kerr. Photo courtesy of Yaupon Holly.

    Entertainment

    Surf, soap and rock & roll, an interview with Yaupon Holly

  • Mercadante was announced as UNFs head coach just over a month after the search officially began.

    Baseball

    New UNF skipper Joe Mercadante introduced to Osprey community

  • UNF logo.

    Latest

    UNF Board of Trustees approves new honors housing, SB 266 updates

  • UNF President Limayem receiving Sentinel Award from Dr. Paul Sanberg at NAIs 12th annual meeting. Mark Skalny (c)2023

    Features

    UNF president wins National Academy of Inventors “Sentinel Award”

  • The United Faculty of Florida are the states largest faculty union, representing over 25,000 faculty members at all 12 of Floridas public universities.

    Latest

    “Comply now, grieve later” Florida faculty union releases guidance for SB 266 compliance

  • Happy 4th of July graphic

    Features

    Where to celebrate Independence Day around Jacksonville: Food, Fireworks, and More

  • An overhead view of the stadium renderings

    Latest Stories

    Where could the Jaguars play if stadium renovations are approved?

  • Student union banner

    Latest

    Anger, anxiety, uncertainty mark last six months of battle waged over Florida university diversity centers’ fight for existence

Navigate Right

Comments (4)

Spinnaker intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. As such, we do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks, slurs, defamation, or the use of language that might be interpreted as libelous. Comments are reviewed and will be removed if they do not adhere to these standards. Spinnaker does not allow anonymous comments, and Spinnaker requires a valid email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments.
All UNF Spinnaker Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • R

    Richard hanksJul 5, 2020 at 8:28 am

    My ancestors weren’t southern born but what people have to realize is that many of the soldiers that fought on the side of the south with poor farmers and had no slaves. They fought for the land That they lived on not for the right to own slaves. This is not a way to respect and honor these men

    Reply
  • A

    AugustJul 2, 2020 at 5:18 pm

    I do agree that having the monument remove will not bring the community together, but seeing the monument is showing the mindset of this community and it’s view of people of color. It’s like having a statue of the KKK because it’s history. A monument should represent love in the hearts of the people, not hatred and injustice. God wanted us to show love for one another. The monument is not a symbol of love but of injustice and division.

    Reply
  • J

    JoanneJul 2, 2020 at 4:04 pm

    Sign my name to the petition. Do not remove history!

    Reply
  • D

    Dennis HoepnerJul 2, 2020 at 2:40 pm

    If the issue to the ancestors is that they were not given a proper burial then why not move the monument to a cemetery where it could be honored and respected with the other headstones which are for the same purpose.
    I would think that may satisfy the people that are offended to see it in our town square.
    Also $100,000 to remove it sounds somewhat steep. WOW

    Reply
4