OPINION: The Confucius Institute: The latest casualty of American xenophobia and hypocrisy
August 24, 2018
As a US-China trade war begins to take shape due to President Trump’s tariffs on a multitude of Chinese goods, American universities are beginning to suffer due to a new xenophobic red scare targeting Chinese culture.
It’s been clear since the election of Trump that the administration is beating the war drums against Iran, and politicians and U.S. media are once again working full-stop to attack what is seen as an axis forming between China, Russia, and the Iranians. This hysteria is made clear in articles that warn of “Chinese infiltration” in American classrooms, serving as the latest attack on universities that provide useful international services to students.
The latest target of anti-Chinese fear mongering is the Confucius Institute, an organization on campuses across the U.S. that provides Chinese language and culture learning services. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act that prohibited the funding of Confucius Institutes as well as limited funding to any university that had a location on campus. These attacks against the Confucius Institute came amid accusations that the organization serves as a propaganda wing of the Chinese Ministry of Education.
It seems convenient that these accusations arise during a period of growing anti-Chinese sentiment and an expanding trade war between the U.S. and China. When an organization such as the National Association of Scholars, which explicitly states in its Issues and Ideals that it’s “anti-multiculturalism” and against “abuses of academic freedom and individual rights,” praises the removal of the Confucius Institute, that should sound alarm bells.
It’s ridiculous to think that the Confucius Institute, an organization that provides a useful service to students across the U.S., can be removed for supposed violations of academic freedom while an organization like the NAS can exist to repeatedly drain universities of what little academic freedoms students and professors have left.
There also exists a double-standard between business relationships deemed as dangerous and those deemed as ordinary. The Confucius Institute was criticized for its ties to the ZTE Corp which has faced steep criticism from the U.S. government due to its trade with Iran and North Korea, countries whose continued existence frustrate the U.S. If ZTE Corp and, by extension, China are guilty of trading with countries with spotty human rights records, where is the criticism of the continued trade of American arms to Saudi Arabia, a country that’s currently massacring Yemeni children with US bombs? American arms manufacturers continue to work closely to recruit talent from American universities, most notably the close partnership between Lockheed Martin and UCF.
It would be preposterous to think that American students are being brainwashed by Chinese propaganda within American universities and not by any company with a dubious record that needs more engineers to program a school bus-seeking-missile.
If the Confucius Institute is guilty of anything, it’s guilty of being Chinese in a nation that is increasingly xenophobic and looking for a fight. It seems tired to point towards the endless hypocrisy within American ideology, but the contradictions are too infuriating to ignore. Organizations that explicitly oppose academic freedom like the NAS or weapons manufacturing behemoths like Lockheed Martin can freely lobby politicians and run willy-nilly on university campuses, while organizations that provide a useful service for students like the Confucius Institute end up as collateral damage in the latest wave of American jingoism.
The real mystery is where the “free speech” right vanishes when politicians seek to limit academic freedom and defund universities with organizations they disagree with. If there was ever a case of American universities bowing to the pressure of the most-aggrieved demographic in America, conservative politicians, this is it.
So farewell Confucius Institute. You dreamed of a world where students can share language and culture across borders; a world far more sophisticated than ours.
Alex G. • Aug 27, 2018 at 7:07 pm
Would the author care to speak about The Confucius Institute’s opinion on the existence of Taiwan as an independent state as well as its opinions on Tibetan independence? Similarly would the author address the Confucius Institute’s position on hiring individuals who belong to the religious group Falun Gong? Maybe the author could address the 2014 position by the American Association of University Professors linked here: https://www.aaup.org/report/confucius-institutes
This article does nothing to address any actual criticisms levied at The Confucius Institute, particularly ones in the linked Politico article that includes papering over China’s own history of discrimination and xenophobia and authoritarian propaganda. Instead it just compares it to LockMar and hides any criticism of The CI, legitimate or otherwise, under “xenophbia”
One major difference from The CI and say, Lockheed Martin is not just that the CI donates money to the university in order to operate on campus, it’s overseen by a nominally non-profit organization whose head is the Vice Premier of China. The equivalent would be if an overseas program from the US was managed by the House Majority Leader and funded by the US Government
While this says “Opinion,” it reads “Puff piece”
Carlos Cuentos • Aug 25, 2018 at 4:55 am
To the anonymous opinion writer:
Since you feel strongly that enslavement under a totalitarian communist dictatorship world is far more sophisticated than ours here in the land of the free, please identify yourself as I would commit to purchasing your one-way ticket to Bejing.
Regards, a deplorable freedom-loving patriot
Norris Nakowski • Aug 26, 2018 at 7:16 pm
To the brazen idiot, Carlos Cuentos, writing above —
Since your head is so far stuck up your own ass to appreciate the benefits of international partnerships – be they cultural, economic, or otherwise , I will ask for you to move to an isolated farm and not purchase any products that in any way utilize products or a supply chain from other places. You are exactly that kind of myopic loser who has severely set back our country’s ability to continue being this international haven that imports and exports the best ideas and products in the world. I am shocked that you bumbling idiots still operate in this cold war lens binary of “free” vs “unfree” when most anyone who isn’t suffering from a neurodegenerative disorder knows that there are many people unfree and suffering here, and many people free and thriving elsewhere. There is a strong case to be made that our bottom 30% lives a life that is as bad or worse than China.